Writing & Preference benchmark

# EQ-Bench 4 leaderboard

> EQ-Bench 4 results for 28 AI models, led by Claude Opus 5 at 1385. What the benchmark measures, who runs it, and a source for every score.
- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/benchmarks/eqbench-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Title: EQ-Bench 4 Leaderboard (October 2026): Scores by Model

As of October 2026, Claude Opus 5 has the highest published EQ-Bench 4 score on Noometry at 1385, out of 28 models with results.

Last verified October 10, 2026

## About EQ-Bench 4

Emotional intelligence in multi-turn role-play conversations, such as building rapport and handling conflict, rated by pairwise LLM-judged comparisons.

- **Category:** [Writing & Preference](https://noometry.com/best/writing)
- **Introduced:** 2026
- **Format:** Pairwise LLM-judged conversations
- **Unit:** Arena rating (Bradley–Terry)
- **Official site:** [eqbench.com](https://eqbench.com/)

## Top 15 models

Top models on EQ-Bench 4

1.  Claude Opus 5 1385
2.  Claude Fable 5 1340
3.  Kimi K3 1339
4.  GPT-5.5 1315
5.  Claude Opus 4.7 1311
6.  Claude Opus 4.8 1281
7.  GPT-5.4 1272
8.  Muse Spark 1.1 1260
9.  GPT-5.6 Sol 1250
10.  Claude Sonnet 5 1236
11.  GPT-5.6 Terra 1234
12.  Inkling 1226
13.  Claude Opus 4.6 1223
14.  GLM-5.2 1222
15.  MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1208
16.  115012001250130013501400

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. [Advertise on Noometry](https://noometry.com/advertise)

## All results

EQ-Bench 4 results by model
| # | Model | Provider | Rating | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Claude Opus 5](https://noometry.com/models/claude-opus-5) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1385 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 2 | [Claude Fable 5](https://noometry.com/models/claude-fable-5) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1340 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 3 | [Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/models/kimi-k3) | [Moonshot AI](https://noometry.com/providers/moonshot) | 1339 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 4 | [GPT-5.5](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-5) | [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai) | 1315 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 5 | [Claude Opus 4.7](https://noometry.com/models/claude-opus-4-7) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1311 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 6 | [Claude Opus 4.8](https://noometry.com/models/claude-opus-4-8) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1281 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 7 | [GPT-5.4](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-4) | [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai) | 1272 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 8 | [Muse Spark 1.1](https://noometry.com/models/muse-spark-1-1) |  [![](/logos/meta.svg) Meta](https://noometry.com/providers/meta) | 1260 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 9 | [GPT-5.6 Sol](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-6-sol) | [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai) | 1250 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 10 | [Claude Sonnet 5](https://noometry.com/models/claude-sonnet-5) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1236 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 11 | [GPT-5.6 Terra](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-6-terra) | [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai) | 1234 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 12 | [Inkling](https://noometry.com/models/inkling) | [T Thinking Machines Lab](https://noometry.com/providers/thinking-machines) | 1226 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 13 | [Claude Opus 4.6](https://noometry.com/models/claude-opus-4-6) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1223 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 14 | [GLM-5.2](https://noometry.com/models/glm-5-2) | [Z.ai (Zhipu)](https://noometry.com/providers/zai) | 1222 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 15 | [MiMo-V2.5-Pro](https://noometry.com/models/mimo-v2-5-pro) | [Xiaomi](https://noometry.com/providers/xiaomi) | 1208 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 16 | [Claude Sonnet 4.6](https://noometry.com/models/claude-sonnet-4-6) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1207 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 17 | [Kimi K2.6](https://noometry.com/models/kimi-k2-6) | [Moonshot AI](https://noometry.com/providers/moonshot) | 1202 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 18 | [DeepSeek V4 Pro](https://noometry.com/models/deepseek-v4-pro) |  [![](/logos/deepseek.svg) DeepSeek](https://noometry.com/providers/deepseek) | 1166 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 19 | [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-6-luna) | [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai) | 1156 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 20 | [MiniMax-M3](https://noometry.com/models/minimax-m3) |  [![](/logos/minimax.svg) MiniMax](https://noometry.com/providers/minimax) | 1150 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 21 | [Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-1-pro-preview) |  [![](/logos/google.svg) Google](https://noometry.com/providers/google) | 1142 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 22 | [Gemma 4 31B IT](https://noometry.com/models/gemma-4-31b-it) |  [![](/logos/google.svg) Google](https://noometry.com/providers/google) | 1120 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 23 | [Qwen3.7 Max](https://noometry.com/models/qwen3-7-max) |  [![](/logos/alibaba.svg) Alibaba (Qwen)](https://noometry.com/providers/alibaba) | 1110 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 24 | [Gemini 3.5 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-5-flash) |  [![](/logos/google.svg) Google](https://noometry.com/providers/google) | 1087 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 25 | [Grok 4.3](https://noometry.com/models/grok-4-3) | [xAI](https://noometry.com/providers/xai) | 1075 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 26 | [Claude Haiku 4.5](https://noometry.com/models/claude-haiku-4-5) | [Anthropic](https://noometry.com/providers/anthropic) | 1064 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 27 | [Qwen3.6 27B](https://noometry.com/models/qwen3-6-27b) |  [![](/logos/alibaba.svg) Alibaba (Qwen)](https://noometry.com/providers/alibaba) | 1026 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |
| 28 | [Mistral Medium 3.5](https://noometry.com/models/mistral-medium-3-5) |  [![](/logos/mistral.svg) Mistral AI](https://noometry.com/providers/mistral) | 993 |  | [EQ-Bench](https://eqbench.com/) |  |

## Compare the leaders

-   [Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-claude-opus-5)
-   [Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-kimi-k3)
-   [Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-gpt-5-5)
-   [Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-claude-opus-5)
-   [Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-kimi-k3)
-   [Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-gpt-5-5)

## Other writing & preference benchmarks

-   [LMArena Text](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-text)
-   [LMArena Creative Writing](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-creative-writing)
-   [Short-Story Creative Writing](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/lech-mazur-writing)
-   [EQ-Bench Creative Writing](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/eqbench-creative-writing)
-   [WildBench](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/wildbench)
-   [LMArena Multi-Turn](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-multi-turn)
-   [LiveBench Language](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-language)

## Frequently asked questions

### What does EQ-Bench 4 measure?

Emotional intelligence in multi-turn role-play conversations, such as building rapport and handling conflict, rated by pairwise LLM-judged comparisons.

### Which model has the highest EQ-Bench 4 score?

As of October 2026, Claude Opus 5 has the highest published EQ-Bench 4 score on Noometry at 1385, out of 28 models with results.

### What is the best open-weight model on EQ-Bench 4?

Kimi K3 has the highest EQ-Bench 4 rating among open-weight models at 1339, ranking 3 of 28 overall.

### Cite this page

Noometry. (2026). EQ-Bench 4 leaderboard. Retrieved October 10, 2026, from https://noometry.com/benchmarks/eqbench-4

Quote Noometry with a link back to this page. It is also available in [Markdown](https://noometry.com/md/benchmarks/eqbench-4.md).
