Google, proprietary

# Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro by Google, released February 2025. Ranked #173 of 354 with a Noometry Index of 39.1. Scores, sources and comparisons.
- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/models/gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Title: Gemini 2.0 Pro Benchmarks, Price & Rank (October 2026)

Gemini 2.0 Pro by Google ranks 173rd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.1. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th.

Last verified October 10, 2026

## Specifications

- **Noometry rank:** #173 of 354
- **Index score:** 39.1
- **Evidence:** Confirmed 14 results
- **Provider:** [![](/logos/google.svg) Google](https://noometry.com/providers/google)
- **Released:** February 5, 2025
- **Weights:** Proprietary
- **Reasoning:** Unknown
- **Context window:** —
- **Max output:** —
- **Input price:** Not listed
- **Output price:** Not listed
- **Blended price:** Not listed
- **Output speed:** Not measured
- **Value:** Not ranked
- **Knowledge cutoff:** Unknown

## Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

Gemini 2.0 Pro category scores

1.  Coding 37.8
2.  Reasoning 22.3
3.  Math 39.7
4.  Knowledge 36.5
5.  Instruction Following 75.5
6.  Long Context 29.2
7.  Writing & Preference 52.7
8.  020406080

Gemini 2.0 Pro category ranks
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Coding](https://noometry.com/best/coding) | 37.8 | #187 | 2 |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 22.3 | #198 | 3 |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 39.7 | #100 | 2 |
| [Knowledge](https://noometry.com/best/knowledge) | 36.5 | #167 | 2 |
| [Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/best/instruction-following) | 75.5 | #59 | 1 |
| [Long Context](https://noometry.com/best/long-context) | 29.2 | #292 | 1 |
| [Writing & Preference](https://noometry.com/best/writing) | 52.7 | #165 | 1 |

## Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where Gemini 2.0 Pro places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

### Strongest categories

Gemini 2.0 Pro: strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/best/instruction-following) | 75.5 | +4.3 | #59 of 305, top 20% |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 39.7 | +3.1 | #100 of 327, top 31% |
| [Writing & Preference](https://noometry.com/best/writing) | 52.7 | −1.1 | #165 of 312, top 53% |

### Weakest categories

Gemini 2.0 Pro: weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Long Context](https://noometry.com/best/long-context) | 29.2 | −11.8 | #292 of 296, top 99% |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 22.3 | −1.3 | #198 of 350, top 57% |
| [Coding](https://noometry.com/best/coding) | 37.8 | −0.9 | #187 of 340, top 56% |

## Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below Gemini 2.0 Pro. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

Models ranked closest to Gemini 2.0 Pro
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Granite 4.2 3b](https://noometry.com/models/granite-4-2-3b) | #169 | 39.4 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-granite-4-2-3b) |
| [Gemini 2.5 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-2-5-flash) | #170 | 39.3 | $0.85 | 152 | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-2-5-flash) |
| [Step 2 16k Exp 202412](https://noometry.com/models/step-2-16k-exp-202412) | #171 | 39.2 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412) |
| [Qwen3 32B](https://noometry.com/models/qwen3-32b) | #172 | 39.2 | $1.22 | 86 | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-32b) |
| [Molmo 2 8b](https://noometry.com/models/molmo-2-8b) | #174 | 39.1 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-molmo-2-8b) |
| [Mercury 2](https://noometry.com/models/mercury-2) | #175 | 39.1 | $0.38 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mercury-2) |
| [Mistral Large 3](https://noometry.com/models/mistral-large-3) | #176 | 39.1 | $0.38 | 7 | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mistral-large-3) |
| [GLM-4.5-Air](https://noometry.com/models/glm-4-5-air) | #177 | 38.9 | $0.43 | 160 | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-4-5-air) |

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. [Advertise on Noometry](https://noometry.com/advertise)

## Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

### Coding

Gemini 2.0 Pro Coding benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Aider Polyglot](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/aider-polyglot) | 35.6% | #30 of 44, top 69% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [LiveBench Coding](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-coding) | 63.5% | #12 of 39, top 31% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

### Reasoning

Gemini 2.0 Pro Reasoning benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [EnigmaEval](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/enigmaeval) | 0.7% | #36 of 38, top 95% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [LiveBench Reasoning](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-reasoning) | 60.1% | #13 of 39, top 34% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [LiveBench Data Analysis](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-data-analysis) | 68% | #7 of 39, top 18% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [Epoch Capabilities Index](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/epoch-capabilities-index) | 135.06 | #126 of 213, top 60% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/eci) | 2025-02-05 |
| [LiveBench](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench) | 65.1% | #11 of 39, top 29% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

### Math

Gemini 2.0 Pro Math benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LiveBench Math](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-math) | 71% | #10 of 39, top 26% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [MATH Level 5](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/math-level-5) | 83.5% | #22 of 79, top 28% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) | 2025-02-06 |

### Knowledge

Gemini 2.0 Pro Knowledge benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [GPQA Diamond](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/gpqa-diamond) | 65.7% | #106 of 186, top 57% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) | 2025-02-07 |
| [Confabulations](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/confabulations) (lower is better) | 18.4% | #29 of 51, top 57% |  | [Lech Mazur benchmarks](https://github.com/lechmazur/confabulations) |  |

### Instruction Following

Gemini 2.0 Pro Instruction Following benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LiveBench Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-if) | 83.4% | #4 of 39, top 11% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

### Long Context

Gemini 2.0 Pro Long Context benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Fiction.LiveBench](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/fiction-livebench) | 41.7% | #42 of 47, top 90% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

### Writing & Preference

Gemini 2.0 Pro Writing & Preference benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LiveBench Language](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/livebench-language) | 44.9% | #16 of 39, top 42% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

## Compare Gemini 2.0 Pro

-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.0 Pro](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-gemini-2-0-pro)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3 32B](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-32b)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Molmo 2 8b](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-molmo-2-8b)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mercury 2](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mercury-2)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gemini-2-5-flash)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Large 3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mistral-large-3)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemini-2-0-pro)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-kimi-k3)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.6](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-4-6)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-8-max)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-5.3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-glm-5-3)
-   [Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-muse-spark-1-3)

## Other Google models

-   [Gemini 3.8 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-8-flash)61.8
-   [Gemini 3.7 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-7-flash)59.8
-   [Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-1-pro-preview)56.7
-   [Gemini 4 Argon](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-4-argon)56.5
-   [Gemini 3 Pro](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-pro)54.8
-   [Gemini 3.5 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-5-flash)54.2
-   [Gemini 3.6 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-6-flash)54.1
-   [Gemini 3 Flash Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-flash-preview)52.3

## Frequently asked questions

### How good is Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro by Google ranks 173rd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.1. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro open source?

No. Gemini 2.0 Pro is proprietary and available only through Google's API and partner platforms.

### What are Gemini 2.0 Pro's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, Gemini 2.0 Pro places best in instruction following, math, writing & preference and lowest in long context, reasoning, coding.

### What is Gemini 2.0 Pro best at?

Its best category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th on Noometry.

### Cite this page

Noometry. (2026). Gemini 2.0 Pro benchmarks and pricing. Retrieved October 10, 2026, from https://noometry.com/models/gemini-2-0-pro

Quote Noometry with a link back to this page. It is also available in [Markdown](https://noometry.com/md/models/gemini-2-0-pro.md).