OpenAI, proprietary

# GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro by OpenAI, released December 2025. Ranked #39 of 354 with a Noometry Index of 52.3. API: $21 in / $168 out per M tokens. 400K context. Scores, sources and comparisons.
- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Title: GPT-5.2 Pro Benchmarks, Price & Rank (October 2026)

GPT-5.2 Pro by OpenAI ranks 39th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 52.3. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 29th. API pricing starts at $21 per million input tokens and $168 per million output tokens, with a 400K-token context window.

Last verified October 10, 2026

## Specifications

- **Noometry rank:** #39 of 354
- **Index score:** 52.3
- **Evidence:** Reported 8 results
- **Provider:** [OpenAI](https://noometry.com/providers/openai)
- **Released:** December 11, 2025
- **Weights:** Proprietary
- **Reasoning:** Yes
- **Context window:** 400K
- **Max output:** 128K
- **Input price:** $21 / M
- **Output price:** $168 / M
- **Blended price:** $57.75 / M
- **Output speed:** Not measured
- **Value:** #216 of 219
- **Knowledge cutoff:** August 2025
- **Input:** text, image

## Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

GPT-5.2 Pro category scores

1.  Reasoning 51.5
2.  Math 65.3
3.  455055606570

GPT-5.2 Pro category ranks
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 51.5 | #33 | 4 |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 65.3 | #29 | 2 |

## Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where GPT-5.2 Pro places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

### Strongest categories

GPT-5.2 Pro: strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 65.3 | +28.7 | #29 of 327, top 9% |

### Weakest categories

GPT-5.2 Pro: weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 51.5 | +27.9 | #33 of 350, top 10% |

## Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below GPT-5.2 Pro. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

Models ranked closest to GPT-5.2 Pro
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [DeepSeek V4 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/deepseek-v4-flash) | #35 | 53.6 | $0.26 | 6 | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro) |
| [GPT-6 Luna](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-6-luna) | #36 | 53.3 | $0.20 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-gpt-6-luna) |
| [Grok 4.7](https://noometry.com/models/grok-4-7) | #37 | 53.1 | $3 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-grok-4-7) |
| [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash) | #38 | 52.8 | $0.26 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro) |
| [Gemini 3 Flash Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-flash-preview) | #40 | 52.3 | $1.13 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-flash-preview-vs-gpt-5-2-pro) |
| [GLM-5.3-Flash](https://noometry.com/models/glm-5-3-flash) | #41 | 51.8 | $0.24 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro) |
| [Qwen3.7 Max](https://noometry.com/models/qwen3-7-max) | #42 | 51.5 | $3.75 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-7-max) |
| [Qwen3.6 Max Preview](https://noometry.com/models/qwen3-6-max-preview) | #43 | 51.5 | $2.92 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview) |

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. [Advertise on Noometry](https://noometry.com/advertise)

## Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

### Reasoning

GPT-5.2 Pro Reasoning benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [ARC-AGI-2](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arc-agi-2) | 54.2% | #32 of 83, top 39% | high | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [ARC-AGI-2](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arc-agi-2) | 38.5% |  | medium | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [SimpleBench](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/simplebench) | 57.4% | #30 of 77, top 39% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [NYT Connections (extended)](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/nyt-connections) | 79.3% | #37 of 91, top 41% |  | [Lech Mazur benchmarks](https://github.com/lechmazur/nyt-connections) |  |
| [ARC-AGI-1](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arc-agi-1) | 85.7% |  | high | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [ARC-AGI-1](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arc-agi-1) | 81.2% |  | medium | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [ARC-AGI-1](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arc-agi-1) | 90.5% | #26 of 83, top 32% | xhigh | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [Epoch Capabilities Index](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/epoch-capabilities-index) | 155.4 | #28 of 213, top 14% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/eci) | 2025-12-11 |

### Math

GPT-5.2 Pro Math benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/frontiermath) | 74% | #21 of 81, top 26% | xhigh | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) | 2026-06-13 |
| [FrontierMath Tier 4](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/frontiermath-tier-4) | 46% | #22 of 63, top 35% | xhigh | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) | 2026-06-13 |
| [FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/frontiermath-tier-4-v1) | 31.3% | #5 of 55, top 10% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) | 2025-12-24 |

## API pricing by provider

GPT-5.2 Pro API prices
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [openai](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) | $21 | $168 | — | 2026-10-10 |
| [openrouter](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.2-pro) | $21 | $168 | — | 2026-10-10 |

[All OpenAI API prices →](https://noometry.com/llm-pricing/openai) [Estimate your cost →](https://noometry.com/tools/cost-calculator)

## Compare GPT-5.2 Pro

-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5 Pro](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-gpt-5-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-flash-preview-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Grok 4.7](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-grok-4-7)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash](https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-gpt-6-luna)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-7-max)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 Flash](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-kimi-k3)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Grok 4.6](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-grok-4-6)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-qwen3-8-max)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs GLM-5.3](https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
-   [GPT-5.2 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-muse-spark-1-3)

## Other OpenAI models

-   [GPT-6 Astra](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-6-astra)70.8
-   [GPT-6.1 Sol](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-6-1-sol)65.6
-   [GPT-5.6 Sol](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-6-sol)65.0
-   [GPT-5.5 Pro](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-5-pro)64.3
-   [GPT-5.5](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-5)63.4
-   [GPT-6 Sol](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-6-sol)61.8
-   [GPT-5.4](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-4)59.4
-   [GPT-5.6 Terra](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-6-terra)59.2

## Frequently asked questions

### How good is GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro by OpenAI ranks 39th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 52.3. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 29th. API pricing starts at $21 per million input tokens and $168 per million output tokens, with a 400K-token context window.

### How much does GPT-5.2 Pro cost?

GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21 per million input tokens and $168 per million output tokens on OpenAI's own API.

### What is GPT-5.2 Pro's context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro accepts up to 400K tokens of input and can write up to 128K tokens in one response.

### Is GPT-5.2 Pro open source?

No. GPT-5.2 Pro is proprietary and available only through OpenAI's API and partner platforms.

### What are GPT-5.2 Pro's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, GPT-5.2 Pro places best in math and lowest in reasoning.

### What is GPT-5.2 Pro best at?

Its best category is math, where it ranks 29th on Noometry.

### Cite this page

Noometry. (2026). GPT-5.2 Pro benchmarks and pricing. Retrieved October 10, 2026, from https://noometry.com/models/gpt-5-2-pro

Quote Noometry with a link back to this page. It is also available in [Markdown](https://noometry.com/md/models/gpt-5-2-pro.md).