Ant Group (inclusionAI), open weights

# Ring-2.6-1T

> Ring-2.6-1T by Ant Group (inclusionAI), released May 2026. 3 published benchmark results. Scores, sources and comparisons.
- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/models/ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Title: Ring-2.6-1T Benchmarks, Price & Rank (October 2026)

Ring-2.6-1T by Ant Group (inclusionAI) has 3 published benchmark results on Noometry, not yet enough to be ranked.

Last verified October 10, 2026

## Specifications

- **Noometry rank:** Unranked
- **Index score:** Not ranked
- **Evidence:** Sparse 3 results
- **Provider:** [![](/logos/ant-group.svg) Ant Group (inclusionAI)](https://noometry.com/providers/ant-group)
- **Released:** May 14, 2026
- **Weights:** Open weights
- **Reasoning:** Unknown
- **Context window:** —
- **Max output:** —
- **Input price:** Not listed
- **Output price:** Not listed
- **Blended price:** Not listed
- **Output speed:** Not measured
- **Value:** Not ranked
- **Knowledge cutoff:** Unknown

## Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

Ring-2.6-1T category scores

1.  Coding 40.7
2.  Reasoning 26.1
3.  202530354045

Ring-2.6-1T category ranks
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Coding](https://noometry.com/best/coding) | 40.7 | — | 1 |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 26.1 | — | 1 |

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. [Advertise on Noometry](https://noometry.com/advertise)

## Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

### Coding

Ring-2.6-1T Coding benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [SciCode](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/scicode) | 42.4% | #71 of 121, top 59% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |
| [ALE-Bench](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/ale-bench) | 432.57 | #89 of 105, top 85% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

### Reasoning

Ring-2.6-1T Reasoning benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [CritPt](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/critpt) | 3.7% | #63 of 134, top 48% |  | [Epoch AI](https://epoch.ai/benchmarks) |  |

## Compare Ring-2.6-1T

-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-6 Astra](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Claude Fable 5.1](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Claude Opus 5.5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Claude Opus 5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Claude Fable 5](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-6.1 Sol](https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Gemini 3.8 Flash](https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/kimi-k3-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.6](https://noometry.com/compare/grok-4-6-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen3.8 Max](https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-8-max-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs GLM-5.3](https://noometry.com/compare/glm-5-3-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs Muse Spark 1.3](https://noometry.com/compare/muse-spark-1-3-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs DeepSeek V4 Pro](https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-ring-2-6-1t)
-   [Ring-2.6-1T vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-ring-2-6-1t)

## Other Ant Group (inclusionAI) models

-   [Ling 3.0 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/ling-3-0-flash)
-   [Ling 3.0 Flash Fin](https://noometry.com/models/ling-3-0-flash-fin)
-   [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante](https://noometry.com/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
-   [Ling 3.0 Flash VL](https://noometry.com/models/ling-3-0-flash-vl)

## Frequently asked questions

### How good is Ring-2.6-1T?

Ring-2.6-1T by Ant Group (inclusionAI) has 3 published benchmark results on Noometry, not yet enough to be ranked.

### Is Ring-2.6-1T open source?

Yes. Ring-2.6-1T's weights are downloadable; check the license for commercial terms.

### Cite this page

Noometry. (2026). Ring-2.6-1T benchmarks and pricing. Retrieved October 10, 2026, from https://noometry.com/models/ring-2-6-1t

Quote Noometry with a link back to this page. It is also available in [Markdown](https://noometry.com/md/models/ring-2-6-1t.md).