Model comparison
AI Co-Mathematician vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.2 Pro in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where AI Co-Mathematician leads 72.3 to 65.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 46% for GPT-5.2 Pro.
Side by side
| AI Co-Mathematician | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 58.1 | 52.3 |
| Released | 2026-05-08 | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
AI Co-Mathematician: —, GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | AI Co-Mathematician | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math AI Co-Mathematician leads
AI Co-Mathematician: 72.3, GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | AI Co-Mathematician | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 75.6% | 46% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 47.9% | 31.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
Frequently asked questions
Is AI Co-Mathematician better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.