Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

58.1

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 46.3% for Qwen3.8 Max.

Side by side

AI Co-Mathematician and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
AI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index58.156.8
Released2026-05-082026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Too close to call

AI Co-Mathematician: 72.3, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%46.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and Qwen3.8 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper