Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

58.1

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Aion 3.5 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $1.40 / $4.40 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $6 for Aion 3.5.
  • GLM-5.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and GLM-5.3 specifications
Aion 3.5GLM-5.3
ProviderAionLabsZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index58.154.8
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$3$1.40
Output $ / M tokens$6$4.40
Results tracked142

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
LMArena Coding—1496
ALE-Bench—1,317

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1489
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.61

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1489

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1516

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English—1457
LMArena Chinese—1528
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1499
LMArena Japanese—1453
LMArena Korean—1472
LMArena Russian—1463
LMArena Spanish—1460

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Aion 3.5: 74.9, GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3
EQ-Bench Creative Writing19292075
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1457
LMArena Multi-Turn—1472

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and GLM-5.3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper