Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

57.9

Unranked Sparse

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Aion 3.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • Aion 3.5 is cheaper at $3 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Kimi K3.
  • Kimi K3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and Kimi K3 specifications
Aion 3.5Kimi K3
ProviderAionLabsMoonshot AI
Noometry Index57.959.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K1.05M
Input $ / M tokens$3$3
Output $ / M tokens$6$15
Results tracked153

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 60.6 (#8)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1659
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
LMArena Coding—1509
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#19)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 63.0 (#15)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1495
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.68
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 74.0 (#13)

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#19)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1520

Multimodal Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 38.4 (#58)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 56.5 (#20)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
LMArena Non-English—1466
LMArena Chinese—1528
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1474
LMArena Japanese—1492
LMArena Korean—1465
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1478

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 77.8 (#13)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following—1481

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
LMArena Longer Query—1494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Aion 3.5: 74.9, Kimi K3: 76.7 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5Kimi K3
EQ-Bench Creative Writing19292082
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1452
EQ-Bench 4—1339
LMArena Multi-Turn—1488

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Kimi K3?

Aion 3.5 is cheaper. It lists at $3 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 lists at $3 and $15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and Kimi K3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper