Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

58.1

Unranked Sparse

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Aion 3.5 leads 74.9 to 66.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $6 for Aion 3.5.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Aion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderAionLabsXiaomi
Noometry Index58.150.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.87
Results tracked119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench—70%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference Aion 3.5 leads

Aion 3.5: 74.9, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1929—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper