Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GLM-4.5
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-4.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5 leads 52.8 to 47.3.
- GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 42.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-07-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 54.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 344.82 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.52 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1429 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.9% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1427 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1433 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1404 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1412 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1430 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1395 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1415 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GLM-4.5?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-4.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GLM-4.5 better for coding?
GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-4.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.