Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 54.7.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-5.3 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.954.8
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Coding13701496
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
ALE-Bench—1,317

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Hard Prompts13561489
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.61

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1489

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1516

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English13401457
LMArena Chinese13411528
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1499
LMArena Japanese—1453
LMArena Korean—1472
LMArena Russian—1463
LMArena Spanish—1460

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following13151477

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query13331482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09GLM-5.3
LMArena Text13641471
LMArena Creative Writing13071457
LMArena Multi-Turn13551472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-5.3 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper