Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 2-7B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 28.0.
  • Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 2-7B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index41.929.1
Released—2023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked929

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Coding13701002

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561009
Chess Puzzles—0%
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—99.06
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Math—1042
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Expert—1036
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1340973
LMArena Chinese1341973
LMArena French—970
LMArena German—978
LMArena Russian—995
LMArena Spanish—1007

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following13151006

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1333999

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 2-7B
LMArena Text13641053
LMArena Creative Writing13071033
LMArena Multi-Turn13551029

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 2-7B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 2-7B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper