Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 56.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1496 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1538 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1479 |
Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1489 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1489 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3.8 Max share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.