Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 3 categories and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index43.043.1
Released—2025-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—164K
Max output—147K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.27
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Coding14331426
SciCode—40.6%
ALE-Bench—745.17

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Hard Prompts14221426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.4%
CritPt—1.7%
DTBench—81.3%
LMCA—28.6%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Math14311402

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Expert1431—

Multilingual Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Non-English14051407
LMArena Russian13941436
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Instruction Following13871404

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Longer Query13951421

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
LMArena Text14151419
LMArena Creative Writing13491403
LMArena Multi-Turn13801411

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 42.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper