Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Muse Glimmer

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 29.1 to 25.7.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Muse Glimmer specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index43.041.7
Released—2026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Coding14331416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts14221396
CritPt—2.6%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14311417

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14311386

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14051384
LMArena Chinese14631412
LMArena Russian13941390
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following13871375

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query13951382

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14151389
LMArena Creative Writing13491339
LMArena Multi-Turn13801399

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Muse Glimmer?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper