Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 Amazon

43.0

Rank #101 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 29.1 to 16.9.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderAmazonArcee AI
Noometry Index43.038.6
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked1724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding14331381
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts14221350
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math14311366

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert14311360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English14051325
LMArena Chinese14631373
LMArena French14491374
LMArena German13951356
LMArena Japanese13831311
LMArena Korean13841306
LMArena Russian13941337
LMArena Spanish14441357

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following13871334

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query13951355

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text14151340
LMArena Creative Writing13491320
LMArena Multi-Turn13801342

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper