Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-5.1-Codex
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.9 to 30.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 66% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,245 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 60.4% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 70.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GPT-5.1-Codex: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-5.1-Codex?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.2 vs 41.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-5.1-Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.