Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 3 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1418 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1416 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1397 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.2 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.