Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Mistral Large
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 38.5 to 18.2.
- Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1277 |
| SciCode | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 264.7 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 62.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 59.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 38.4% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | 1257 |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.5% |
| DTBench | — | 65.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50.1% |
| LMCA | — | 16.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 48.4% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1262 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 50.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1232 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 59.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 21.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 43.5% |
| MMLU | — | 80% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | 1237 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1257 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1325 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1202 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | 1249 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 67.9% |
| IFEval | — | 87.7% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | 1261 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1266 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1243 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | 1260 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 69% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 985 |
| WildBench | — | 80.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 39.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Mistral Large?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Mistral Large better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Mistral Large share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.