Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 38.5.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.