Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs o3-pro
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 44.0.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1438 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1506 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1427 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than o3-pro?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.