Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 95× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.7 to 27.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Humanity's Last Exam: 3.6% for Amazon Nova Lite and 36.2% for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
ProviderAmazonAnthropic
Noometry Index31.958.3
Released2024-12-032026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K1M
Max output10K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$5
Output $ / M tokens$0.24$25
Results tracked3466

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Coding12391518
ALE-Bench236.251,323
SWE-bench Verified—83.5%
FrontierCode—38.5%
LMArena WebDev—1558
SciCode—54.5%
GSO—44.1%
WeirdML—76.4%
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
MirrorCode—31.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: —, Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—49.2%
OSWorld 2.0—18.2%
τ²-bench Banking—40.2%
PostTrainBench—28.6%
ExploitBench—26.5%
GBAEval—43.8%
GDP.pdf—21%
LMArena Search—1233
Vending-Bench 2—10,937

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts12201506
ARC-AGI-2—75.8%
SimpleBench—61.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—80.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—39%
ARC-AGI-1—93.5%
CritPt—12%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Thematic Generalization—72.8%
EBR-Bench—19%
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—28%
DTBench—94.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
LMCA—52.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.25
ForecastBench—60.3
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Math12271499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—70.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—73.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.8%
ProofBench—54%
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—43.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—22.9%

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%36.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%12%
LMArena Expert12011521
GPQA Diamond—90.2%
SimpleQA Verified—51.7%
MMLU-Pro60%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision9901316
Blueprint-Bench 2—24.5%
Furniture Assembly—33.3%
LMArena Document—1495

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Non-English12081480
LMArena Chinese12251531
LMArena French12371503
LMArena German12291495
LMArena Japanese11531472
LMArena Korean11531464
LMArena Russian12161494
LMArena Spanish12261495

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following12051498
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Longer Query12341505

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text12291490
LMArena Creative Writing11971486
LMArena Multi-Turn11991505
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1914
WildBench75%—
EQ-Bench 4—1311
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 95× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5 and $25.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.

Related comparisons

Go deeper