Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Micro vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 163× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Micro Amazon

30.4

Rank #294 Confirmed

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.7 to 26.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 5.5% for Amazon Nova Micro and 12% for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
ProviderAmazonAnthropic
Noometry Index30.458.3
Released2024-12-032026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output10K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.035$5
Output $ / M tokens$0.14$25
Results tracked3266

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Coding12181518
SWE-bench Verified—83.5%
FrontierCode—38.5%
LMArena WebDev—1558
SciCode—54.5%
GSO—44.1%
WeirdML—76.4%
LiveBench Coding20.2%—
MirrorCode—31.1%
ALE-Bench—1,323

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—49.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard22.3%—
OSWorld 2.0—18.2%
τ²-bench Banking—40.2%
PostTrainBench—28.6%
ExploitBench—26.5%
GBAEval—43.8%
GDP.pdf—21%
LMArena Search—1233
Vending-Bench 2—10,937

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts11911506
ARC-AGI-2—75.8%
SimpleBench—61.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—80.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—39%
ARC-AGI-1—93.5%
CritPt—12%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Thematic Generalization—72.8%
EBR-Bench—19%
LiveBench Reasoning25.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—28%
DTBench—94.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis34%—
LMCA—52.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.25
ForecastBench—60.3
LiveBench29.6%—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Math12061499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—70.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—73.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.8%
ProofBench—54%
Omni-MATH21.4%—
LiveBench Math34.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—43.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—22.9%

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%12%
LMArena Expert11841521
GPQA Diamond—90.2%
Humanity's Last Exam—36.2%
SimpleQA Verified—51.7%
MMLU-Pro51.1%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
MMLU70.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: —, Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision—1316
Blueprint-Bench 2—24.5%
Furniture Assembly—33.3%
LMArena Document—1495

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Non-English11861480
LMArena Chinese12091531
LMArena French12381503
LMArena German11921495
LMArena Japanese11541472
LMArena Korean11501464
LMArena Russian11851494
LMArena Spanish12251495

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following11741498
LiveBench Instruction Following48%—
IFEval76%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Longer Query12051505

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text12081490
LMArena Creative Writing11721486
LMArena Multi-Turn11781505
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1914
WildBench74.3%—
EQ-Bench 4—1311
LiveBench Language15.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 163× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Claude Opus 4.7?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5 and $25.

Is Amazon Nova Micro or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.

Related comparisons

Go deeper