Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 4 Maverick score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 5 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Llama 4 Maverick leads 28.2 to 16.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 44.6% for Amazon Nova Pro and 65% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at $0.19 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 128K |
| Max output | 10K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1302 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 15.6% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 24.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 4 Maverick leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | 37.3% |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1281 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 132.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | 42.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1299 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 73% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge Llama 4 Maverick leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | 81% |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 22.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1259 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 67% |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Llama 4 Maverick leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1142 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |
Multilingual Llama 4 Maverick leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1259 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1293 |
Instruction Following Llama 4 Maverick leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.5% | 90.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1267 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1280 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1267 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | 62% |
| WildBench | 77.7% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1289 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 860 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Llama 4 Maverick?
Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 4 Maverick score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?
Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 4 Maverick share?
29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.