Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Mercury 2.5

Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Mercury 2.5 Inception

33.5

Rank #242 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 23.3.
  • Mercury 2.5 is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
  • Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 260K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Pro and Mercury 2.5 specifications
Amazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index31.033.5
Released2024-12-032026-09-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K260K
Max output10K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.80$0.04
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$0.15
Results tracked384

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury 2.5 leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
SciCode—38.5%
LiveBench Coding38.1%—
LMArena Coding1270—
ALE-Bench—301.65

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Mercury 2.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Mercury 2.5 leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
ProofBench—3%
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Mercury 2.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Mercury 2.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Mercury 2.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Non-English1234—
LMArena Chinese1244—
LMArena French1271—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1240—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Mercury 2.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1235—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Mercury 2.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Longer Query1255—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Mercury 2.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Text1259—
LMArena Creative Writing1212—
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1246—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper