Model comparison

Claude 1.3 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#25); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 1.3 Anthropic

—

Unranked

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.6

Rank #25 Confirmed

Summary

  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 1.3 and GLM-5.3 specifications
Claude 1.3GLM-5.3
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index—54.6
Released2023-04-182026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked241

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 59.0 (#12)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
LMArena WebDev—1623
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
LMArena Coding—1499
ALE-Bench—1,317

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 36.3 (#34)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 45.2 (#42)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1491
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.56

Math Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 62.1 (#27)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1493

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#34)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1512
MMLU77%—
TriviaQA86.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 55.9 (#27)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English—1457
LMArena Chinese—1523
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1505
LMArena Japanese—1438
LMArena Korean—1478
LMArena Russian—1460
LMArena Spanish—1444

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 77.8 (#15)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1481

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 45.5 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query—1485

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, GLM-5.3: 75.9 (#6)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3GLM-5.3
LMArena Text—1473
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1473

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 1.3 better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#25); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 1.3 and GLM-5.3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 1.3 has 2 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper