Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Claude 2.1 and Dolly 2.0-12b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (25.2 vs 25.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Dolly 2.0-12b leads 27.3 to 10.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 776 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 89.67 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 804 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 871 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 26.2% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 39.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 836 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 814 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 740 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Claude 2.1 and Dolly 2.0-12b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (25.2 vs 25.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 2.1 or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?
Claude 2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 26.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.