Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

24.9

Rank #340 Reported

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.7

Rank #215 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.1 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 leads 37.0 to 15.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 38.3% for GPT-4.1.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and GPT-4.1 specifications
Claude 2.1GPT-4.1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index24.935.7
Released2023-11-212025-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked752

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), GPT-4.1: 34.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
WeirdML7.1%39%
SWE-bench Verified—48.5%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—39.6%
Aider Polyglot—52.4%
LMArena Coding—1391
CadEval—42%
ALE-Bench—558.1

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#40)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—54%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#334)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
DTBench51%68.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.22136.79
ForecastBench54.261.5
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
SimpleBench—27%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Chess Puzzles—6%
EnigmaEval—2.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1384
LMCA—25.6%

Math GPT-4.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), GPT-4.1: 21.4 (#269)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%38.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—6%
Omni-MATH—47.1%
LMArena Math—1369
MATH Level 5—83%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge GPT-4.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), GPT-4.1: 37.0 (#152)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
GPQA Diamond33%66.9%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
SimpleQA Verified—31.1%
MMLU-Pro—81.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.6%
GPQA (HELM)—65.9%
LMArena Expert—1364
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 37.5 (#66)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
LMArena Vision—1210
GeoBench—72%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 49.6 (#128)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
LMArena Non-English—1370
LMArena Chinese—1382
LMArena French—1383
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1320
LMArena Korean—1339
LMArena Russian—1377
LMArena Spanish—1375

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 71.5 (#148)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
IFEval—83.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1367

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1385

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.1: 57.8 (#120)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.1
LMArena Text—1383
LMArena Creative Writing—1363
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1420
WildBench—85.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1398

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-4.1 better for coding?

GPT-4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-4.1 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper