Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 20.3 to 9.6.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Laguna M.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Laguna M.1?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.