Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Mistral
Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral leads 22.3 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1162 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1149 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Mistral leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1180 |
Knowledge Mistral leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1125 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1109 |
| LMArena French | — | 1180 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1152 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1153 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1158 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1147 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Mistral?
Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Mistral better for coding?
Mistral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Mistral share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.