Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 10.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 99.2% for Muse Spark 1.3.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Claude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.254.8
Released2023-11-212026-09-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench51%96.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27156.75
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
ForecastBench54.2—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%99.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond33%—
LMArena Expert—1516
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper