Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 10.2.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1016 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 993 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 947 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.