Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 27.6 to 10.2.
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1101 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1100 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 75.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena French | — | 1135 |
| LMArena German | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1087 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1088 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.