Model comparison

Claude 2 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 64.8 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 98.6% for DeepSeek V4 Pro.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro specifications
Claude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index25.054.3
Released2023-07-112026-04-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1.98
Results tracked848

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
SWE-bench Verified—77.6%
FrontierCode—28.6%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—51%
WeirdML—66.2%
LMArena Coding—1470
ALE-Bench—1,403
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
APEX-Agents—47.3%
Vending-Bench 2—3,285

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
DTBench51.9%93.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13155.31
ARC-AGI-2—61.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—91.3%
ARC-AGI-1—90.5%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—47%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1461
Mystery Game Puzzles—43%
LMCA—45.5%
Surface Evolver Bench—40%
ForecastBench—56.1

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%98.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.6%
ProofBench—50%
LMArena Math—1455
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
GPQA Diamond34.7%91.7%
SimpleQA Verified—52.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.6%
LMArena Expert—1464
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Non-English—1439
LMArena Chinese—1486
LMArena French—1472
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1447
LMArena Russian—1453
LMArena Spanish—1458

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1448

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
CL-bench Life—13.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1458

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2DeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Text—1451
LMArena Creative Writing—1446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1553
EQ-Bench 4—1166
LMArena Multi-Turn—1467

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and DeepSeek V4 Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper