Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 29.5 to 8.7.
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 30.7 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1084 |
| MBPP+ | — | 45% |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1071 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1107 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1060 |
| LMArena French | — | 1064 |
| LMArena German | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1049 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1057 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1056 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1059 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1040 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.