Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.7 to 8.7.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1090 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1117 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1064 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1045 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1056 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1071 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1053 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.