Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1465 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 97.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 156.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 99.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1423 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1480 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1404 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1431 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1425 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Grok 4.6 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.