Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.4

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Scout in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 4 Scout leads 31.8 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 62.3% for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Claude 2Llama 4 Scout
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index24.727.4
Released2023-07-112025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked843

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
LMArena Coding—1286
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
DTBench51.9%57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08129.64
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1266
LMCA—12%
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Llama 4 Scout leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%7.8%
MATH Level 511.7%62.3%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1286
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Llama 4 Scout leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond34.7%51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%
LMArena Expert—1236
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English—1253
LMArena Chinese—1256
LMArena French—1283
LMArena German—1274
LMArena Japanese—1209
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1277

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
IFEval—81.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1248

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
Fiction.LiveBench—36%
LMArena Longer Query—1265

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text—1279
LMArena Creative Writing—1249
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1281

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Llama 4 Scout share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper