Model comparison
Claude 2 vs phi-3-medium 14B
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 34.7% for Claude 2 and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 121.23 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 17.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
Knowledge Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 27.6% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | 78% |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | 73.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.