Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs phi-3-medium 14B
Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 14.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | 48.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 30.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1286 | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 121.23 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math phi-3-medium 14B leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | 17.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Haiku leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 27.6% |
| MMLU | 74.3% | 78% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | — |
| LMArena French | 1264 | — |
| LMArena German | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1173 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.