Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs phi-3-medium 14B

Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 14.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Claude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.229.7
Released2024-10-222024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%37.6%
BigCodeBench Complete59%48.7%
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1286—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15121.23
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
LiveBench43.5%—
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math phi-3-medium 14B leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
MATH Level 546.4%17.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond38.1%27.6%
MMLU74.3%78%
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1264—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1173—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 Haikuphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.2 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and phi-3-medium 14B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper