Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Anthropic

34.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.7 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 66.7 to 19.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.5% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 97.8% for Claude Opus 4.7.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index34.658.3
Released2024-06-202026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$5
Output $ / M tokens—$25
Results tracked6066

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
GSO4.6%44.1%
WeirdML40%76.4%
LMArena Coding13421518
SWE-bench Verified—83.5%
FrontierCode—38.5%
Aider Polyglot51.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1558
SciCode—54.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct46.8%—
LiveBench Coding67.1%—
MirrorCode—31.1%
BigCodeBench Complete58.6%—
CadEval48%—
ALE-Bench—1,323
HumanEval+81.7%—
MBPP+74.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench—80.2%
APEX-Agents—49.2%
OSWorld 2.0—18.2%
TheAgentCompany24%—
τ²-bench Banking—40.2%
Cybench17.5%—
PostTrainBench—28.6%
BALROG32.6%—
ExploitBench—26.5%
GBAEval—43.8%
GDP.pdf—21%
LMArena Search—1233
METR Time Horizons45.2%—
Vending-Bench 2—10,937

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
SimpleBench41.4%61.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts13051506
DTBench67.8%94.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.55156.25
ForecastBench60.760.3
ARC-AGI-2—75.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—80.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—39%
ARC-AGI-1—93.5%
CritPt—12%
Chess Puzzles—30%
EnigmaEval0.9%—
Thematic Generalization—72.8%
EBR-Bench—19%
LiveBench Reasoning56.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—28%
LiveBench Data Analysis55%—
LMCA—52.2%
LiveBench59%—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.5%97.8%
LMArena Math13071499
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)2.1%43.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%22.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—70.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—73.6%
ProofBench—54%
Omni-MATH27.6%—
LiveBench Math52.3%—
MATH Level 556.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond55.3%90.2%
Humanity's Last Exam4.1%36.2%
LMArena Expert12651521
SimpleQA Verified—51.7%
MMLU-Pro77.7%—
Confabulations19.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12%
GPQA (HELM)56.5%—
MMLU87.3%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision11251316
Video-MME60%—
GeoBench62%—
VPCT33%—
Blueprint-Bench 2—24.5%
Furniture Assembly—33.3%
LMArena Document—1495

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Non-English12831480
LMArena Chinese12721531
LMArena French13051503
LMArena German12971495
LMArena Japanese12341472
LMArena Korean12001464
LMArena Russian13061494
LMArena Spanish12901495

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following12971498
LiveBench Instruction Following69.3%—
IFEval85.5%—

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Longer Query13111505

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text12981490
LMArena Creative Writing12921486
EQ-Bench Creative Writing14511914
LMArena Multi-Turn13261505
Short-Story Creative Writing80.3%—
WildBench79.2%—
EQ-Bench 4—1311
LiveBench Language53.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude Opus 4.7 share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.7 has 66.

Related comparisons

Go deeper