Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | 1319 |
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | 1308 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1278 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1298 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | 1303 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.0 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.