Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 37 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 37 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | 63.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1350 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | 59.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | 31.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | 78.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 63.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 135.36 |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | 66.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 57.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | 82.2% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 64.1% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | 12.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1339 |
| MMLU | 84.6% | 79.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1294 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1363 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | 85.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1336 |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1350 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | 51.3% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
37 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.