Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 37.5% for Claude 3 Opus and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.539.1
Released2024-02-292025-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Coding38.6%63.5%
Aider Polyglot—35.6%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
EnigmaEval0.8%0.7%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%60.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%68%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91135.06
LiveBench49.2%65.1%
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA17%—
ForecastBench58.4—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Math43.6%71%
MATH Level 537.5%83.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LMArena Math1273—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond47.2%65.7%
Confabulations22.7%18.4%
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%83.4%
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
Fiction.LiveBench—41.7%
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Language50.4%44.9%
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper