Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 2-13B
Claude 3 Opus and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.2 to 29.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.6% for Claude 3 Opus and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1062 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 42.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 106.17 |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | 72.8% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
Math Llama 2-13B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Llama 2-13B leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 84.6% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1087 |
Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1045 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Llama 2-13B?
Claude 3 Opus and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Llama 2-13B share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.