Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 36.8 to 14.8.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.543.4
Released2024-02-292026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4623

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding12641469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
ALE-Bench—513.95
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.5: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12451450
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math12731436
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
ProofBench—16%
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert12231460
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision10231247

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English12581404
LMArena Chinese12481468
LMArena French12751447
LMArena German12581421
LMArena Japanese12041306
LMArena Korean11871363
LMArena Russian12801395
LMArena Spanish12461416

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12481434
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query12591445

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text12621428
LMArena Creative Writing12351393
LMArena Multi-Turn12751445
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper