Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Claude 3 Opus and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Olmo 7b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

30.3

Rank #295 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3 Opus leads 47.2 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.530.3
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4610

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12641016
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1245993
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12731018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1258977
LMArena Chinese12481014
LMArena Russian1280947
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1248978
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12621032
LMArena Creative Writing1235990
LMArena Multi-Turn12751007
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Claude 3 Opus and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper