Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Phi-4 Mini

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 22.4 to 14.6.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Claude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.530.9
Released2024-02-292024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.075
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked463

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
SciCode—10.8%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Phi-4 Mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
SimpleBench23.5%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1245—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91—
ForecastBench58.4—
LiveBench49.2%—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper