Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Sonnet leads 21.1 to 7.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 40.6% for Claude 3 Sonnet and 24.6% for DeepSeek LLM 67B.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index28.824.8
Released2024-02-292023-11-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3015

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Coding12231096
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Hard Prompts11971070
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69110.54
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench53.6%—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%0.8%
LMArena Math12131108
MATH Level 518.2%6.4%

Knowledge Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
GPQA Diamond40.6%24.6%
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), DeepSeek LLM 67B: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Non-English12051073
LMArena Chinese11881132
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Instruction Following12001079

Long Context Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Longer Query12111092

Writing & Preference Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetDeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Text12181105
LMArena Creative Writing11861067
LMArena Multi-Turn12271082

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Claude 3 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.3 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper