Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Command R7B

Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

69.0

Rank #2 Confirmed

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 50.7 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5.1Command R7B
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index69.032.5
Released2026-09-012024-12-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$10$0.0375
Output $ / M tokens$50$0.15
Results tracked521

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
FrontierCode50.9%—
CursorBench51.8%—
LMArena WebDev1744—
FrontierSWE56.3%—
SciCode63.1%—
GSO88.2%—
WeirdML92.9%—
LMArena Coding1528—
MirrorCode73.3%—
ALE-Bench2,143—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5.1 leads

Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5), Command R7B: 26.1

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
APEX-Agents68.6%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—32.1%
Remote Labor Index17.9%—
GDP.pdf29.6%—
Vending-Bench 25,422—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
ARC-AGI-290%—
NYT Connections (extended)90%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt31.1%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
EBR-Bench57.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1526—
Mystery Game Puzzles58%—
DTBench97.6%—
LMCA65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index164.7—

Math Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)90.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 487.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math1525—
FrontierMath Erdős0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
Humanity's Last Exam46.5%—
SimpleQA Verified70.8%—
LMArena Expert1535—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
LMArena Vision1318—
Blueprint-Bench 241.9%—
Furniture Assembly70%—
LMArena Document1513—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
LMArena Non-English1507—
LMArena Chinese1586—
LMArena French1525—
LMArena German1500—
LMArena Japanese1543—
LMArena Korean1534—
LMArena Russian1521—
LMArena Spanish1516—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
LMArena Instruction Following1517—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
LMArena Longer Query1522—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2), Command R7B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Command R7B
LMArena Text1510—
LMArena Creative Writing1507—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2162—
LMArena Multi-Turn1492—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Command R7B?

Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Command R7B?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5.1 lists at $10 and $50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Command R7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Command R7B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper